// CRYPTO NEWS

Upbit says it only expressed interest in future OUSD participation

By Lysias · July 3, 2026

Key Takeaways

What Upbit Actually Said

South Korean crypto exchange Upbit has pushed back on suggestions that it is directly participating in the issuance of Open USD, a new dollar-backed stablecoin project. Upbit’s operator, Dunamu, had been named among more than 140 businesses listed by Open Standard as part of the initiative. However, an Upbit spokesperson told Cointelegraph that the exchange had only indicated a potential willingness to consider taking part in a future expansion of the OpenStandard ecosystem, stopping well short of confirming any current involvement in minting, redeeming or backing the token.

This clarification did not come in isolation. According to a Friday report by ChosunBiz, Samsung Electronics said it had not engaged in formal discussions with the Open Standard project and was unclear on what role it was supposed to play. Shinhan Financial Group and KBank reportedly offered a similar message, saying they had merely signaled they would consider the initiative rather than commit to it. Cointelegraph noted that it reached out to Open Standard for comment but had not received a response before publication.

The pattern across these statements suggests a gap between how Open Standard characterized its list of participating businesses and how those businesses themselves describe their level of commitment. Being named on a list of “signed up” partners, it turns out, may mean very different things depending on who is asked.

Why the OUSD Announcement Drew Scrutiny

Open Standard unveiled OUSD on Tuesday, according to Cointelegraph, presenting it as a dollar-backed stablecoin with backing from a notably broad roster of companies, including Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, Google, Samsung Electronics and Dunamu. The scale of that list is part of what made the announcement notable in the first place, since payment networks, asset managers and technology firms are not typically grouped together this way around a single token launch.

Open Standard had also said that participating businesses would be able to mint and redeem OUSD without fees or volume limits, and that earnings generated from the stablecoin’s reserves would be distributed to participating companies. That fee-free, limit-free structure is unusual in the stablecoin market, where issuers commonly rely on some combination of fees, minimum thresholds or reserve-yield retention to sustain operations.

That unusual structure is precisely what drew skepticism from industry figures. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire questioned whether offering free and unlimited minting and redemption was sustainable, Cointelegraph reported. Separately, ARK Invest director of research Lorenzo Valente described the announcement as a “giant” letter of intent, according to Cointelegraph, a characterization that lines up with the subsequent clarifications from Upbit, Samsung, Shinhan and KBank about the limited nature of their actual commitments.

For everyday crypto users, this matters because stablecoins are increasingly used as a bridge between traditional finance and digital assets, for payments, trading and savings alike. A stablecoin backed by an impressive list of household names can create an impression of institutional endorsement and reliability that may not yet reflect firm operational commitments. Users considering exposure to any new stablecoin should look for clarity on who is actually issuing it, how reserves are managed and whether the companies named as partners have confirmed binding roles, rather than relying on the presence of recognizable logos alone.

Regulatory Uncertainty in South Korea

Part of why South Korean firms may be treading carefully is that the country’s Digital Asset Basic Act has not yet been passed, Cointelegraph reports. This leaves unresolved questions about which entities are permitted to issue stablecoins and what functions they may legally perform within such an ecosystem. Lawmakers have reportedly been debating whether stablecoin issuance should be restricted to banks or opened up to qualified non-bank issuers, while the broader regulatory framework remains under discussion, according to Cointelegraph.

This regulatory ambiguity makes it harder for South Korean companies to publicly commit to initiatives like OUSD, since the rules covering issuance, reserve management and participation have not been finalized. In that context, the cautious, qualified language used by Upbit, Samsung, Shinhan and KBank appears less like a rejection of the project and more like an effort to avoid overstating involvement in something still legally undefined.

Hype Check

Claim: Open Standard presented OUSD as backed by a coalition of over 140 major businesses, including Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, Google, Samsung Electronics and Dunamu, offering fee-free and limit-free minting and redemption, according to Cointelegraph. Reality: Several of the named South Korean firms, including Upbit’s operator Dunamu, Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group and KBank, have since clarified they only expressed conditional or future interest rather than confirmed participation, and Open Standard did not respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment. Verdict: Mixed.

This is not financial advice.

Source

Researched with AI assistance, fact-checked and edited by a human. Not financial advice.

📬 Get Cryptoverse Weekly

The week’s most important crypto & AI stories, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Double opt-in — we’ll email you a confirmation link.